How a British Software Engineer Built Interview-Ready English

The Problem

You know how to do the job. The difficult part is explaining it in English when an interviewer is watching. She was a software engineer in London. In the room, system design was what broke down.

Before and After

What We Worked On

Practice matched the round she actually had to speak: system design. Each mock got notes on the same answer — where she paused, which words were vague, and where the structure broke.

• Practised clarifying requirements before naming services
• Used a fixed explanation sequence: scope → components → bottlenecks → trade-offs
• Practised explaining trade-offs aloud, not only drawing boxes
• Worked on metrics and numbers in English (latency, load, cost)
• Narrated architecture without stopping to translate each sentence

Useful references along the way: STAR interview framework, What to expect in English interviews.

What to Practise

• Clarify scope before you name services.
• Use one spoken sequence every time: requirements → scale → architecture → bottlenecks → trade-offs.
• Practise saying metrics (latency, QPS, storage) in full sentences.
• Name one trade-off out loud even if you are sure about the design.
• Record a 15-minute walk and listen only for jumps and unfinished sentences.

The Difference

Gained clearer, more confident English for interviews. She could explain the work more clearly when questions got hard. That readiness was the goal — not a promised job offer.

Why System Design Is Difficult in English

System design is a 30–45 minute spoken explanation. You must sequence components, defend trade-offs, handle follow-ups, and keep vocabulary accurate while the clock runs. Translating each sentence in your head uses the time the interviewer needed for depth. A fixed spoken order is what keeps the round coherent in a second language.

Preparing for a similar path? Read How a London Software Engineer Prepped for Meta Coding Rounds.